February, 2006

Reply to Dalrymple

by Anne Applebaum

February 12th, 2006

In her reply to Dalyrmple’s lead essay, the Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum lists “three factors which could, over the next decade, help reverse Europe’s course.” Market-friendly leaders, “an acknowledgment of the possibilities presented by the new members of the European Union”, and ditching “their increasingly bizarre obsession with the evil United States,” would, Applebaum argues, go a long way to “help Europe escape its current economic and psychological slump.”

Read: Reply to Dalrymple

* * *

Reply to Dalrymple

by Charles Kupchan

February 10th, 2006

Disagreeing sharply with Theodore Dalrymple’s grim diagnosis, Georgetown University international affairs professor and Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Charles Kupchan maintains that “it is simply not the case that the continent is populated primarily by sclerotic, dysfunctional economies on their last gasp.” However, Kupchan argues that Dalrymple’s essay “considerably underestimates . . . the challenge of integrating Muslim immigrants into European society.” The Paris riots and the Danish cartoon imbroglio demonstrate that Europe has “embraced multiculturalism in fact, but not yet in spirit.”

Read: Reply to Dalrymple

* * *

Reply to Dalrymple

by Timothy B. Smith

February 8th, 2006

According to historian Timothy Smith, author of France in Crisis, the main problem of Old Europe is that overregulated labor markets, alleged to “humanize” capitalism and promote “solidarity,” instead work to consolidate economic privileges for tenured labor unionists and state employees, and exclude broad swathes of the population, especially immigrants, from the work force. Smith is careful to distinguish the relative stagnation of France, Germany, and Italy from their more successful Scandanavian counterparts, and argues against Dalrymple that the U.K. is really in pretty good shape.

Read: Reply to Dalrymple

* * *

Is “Old Europe” Doomed?

by Theodore Dalrymple

February 6th, 2006

Old Europe may not be doomed, though it is “sleepwalking to further relative decline,” says Theodore Dalrymple. “The principle motor of Europe’s current decline is,” he argues, “its obsession with social security.” If Europe is to have a fighting chance, it must overcome a politics in which “personal and sectional interest has become all-powerful” and “the goal of everyone is to parasitize everyone else.”

Read: Is “Old Europe” Doomed?

* * *

Monday: Dalrymple on the Fate of “Old Europe”

by The Editors

February 3rd, 2006

Denis Dutton, editor of Arts and Letters Daily, has called Theodore Dalrymple “a writer of genius: lucid, unsentimental, and profoundly honest . . . one of the great essayists of our age.”
This Monday, Dalrymple will kick off the new issue of Cato Unbound with an essay that asks and answers the urgent question: [...]

Read: Monday: Dalrymple on the Fate of “Old Europe”

* * *