<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reply to Easterly: Evidence Beats Rhetoric, Every Time</title>
	<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>Big Ideas for a Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trade Diversion</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Diversion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 06:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foreign aid grudge matches&lt;/strong&gt;

Pablo at PSD points to an William Easterly vs Jeff Sachs debate on foreign aid in the LA Times, while Jim at Our Word is Our Weapon notes that Easterly and Steve Radelet are still trading comments at Cato Unbound. Pablo bills the former as a Columbia v...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foreign aid grudge matches</strong></p>
<p>Pablo at PSD points to an William Easterly vs Jeff Sachs debate on foreign aid in the LA Times, while Jim at Our Word is Our Weapon notes that Easterly and Steve Radelet are still trading comments at Cato Unbound. Pablo bills the former as a Columbia v&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Word is Our Weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Word is Our Weapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Easterly vs the facts&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;ve been slowly brewing quite a long post exploring William Easterly&#8217;s arguments on poverty traps, but in the meantime it would be a shame if I didn&#8217;t highlight the recent flurry of discussion around the publication of his new book....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Easterly vs the facts</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve been slowly brewing quite a long post exploring William Easterly&#8217;s arguments on poverty traps, but in the meantime it would be a shame if I didn&#8217;t highlight the recent flurry of discussion around the publication of his new book&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Diversion</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Diversion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/04/09/steve-radelet/evidence-beats-rhetoric/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Foreign Aid at Cato Unbound&lt;/strong&gt;

This month's Cato Unbound focuses on foreign aid. I found Branko Milanovic's criticism of William Easterly very compelling. Perhaps Easterly's full-length book will contain nuances that accomodate Milanovic's objections. I found Deepak Lal's essay...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foreign Aid at Cato Unbound</strong></p>
<p>This month&#8217;s Cato Unbound focuses on foreign aid. I found Branko Milanovic&#8217;s criticism of William Easterly very compelling. Perhaps Easterly&#8217;s full-length book will contain nuances that accomodate Milanovic&#8217;s objections. I found Deepak Lal&#8217;s essay&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
