<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cognitive Dissonance:  The State of America’s Iran Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-americas-iran-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-americas-iran-policy/</link>
	<description>Big Ideas for a Better World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikners.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-americas-iran-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-382974</link>
		<dc:creator>ikners.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-america%e2%80%99s-iran-policy/#comment-382974</guid>
		<description>[...] that Tehran would choose some other future date to bring about the end of days. AEI’s Reuel Marc Gerecht casually dismissed claims that the task would be difficult, arguing instead: “The issue isn’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Tehran would choose some other future date to bring about the end of days. AEI’s Reuel Marc Gerecht casually dismissed claims that the task would be difficult, arguing instead: “The issue isn’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-americas-iran-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4942</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/07/09/reuel-marc-gerecht/cognitive-dissonance-the-state-of-america%e2%80%99s-iran-policy/#comment-4942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran Freedom Support Act&lt;/strong&gt;

 Fullosseousflap notes the passage of the so-named “Iran Freedom Support Act.” Despite its title, the first half of the Act deals with potential sanctions. And despite Forbes’ statement that the Act “would impose mandatory sanctions on entities...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran Freedom Support Act</strong></p>
<p> Fullosseousflap notes the passage of the so-named “Iran Freedom Support Act.” Despite its title, the first half of the Act deals with potential sanctions. And despite Forbes’ statement that the Act “would impose mandatory sanctions on entities&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.239 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 02:05:56 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
