<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Breed of Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/10/13/markos-moulitsas/a-new-breed-of-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/10/13/markos-moulitsas/a-new-breed-of-democrats/</link>
	<description>Big Ideas for a Better World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freedom Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/10/13/markos-moulitsas/a-new-breed-of-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom Democrats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-unbound.org/?p=308#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Libertarian Egalitarianism: Myth or Reality?&lt;/strong&gt;

Bruce McQuain responds to my post that questioned his earlier statement that libertarianism and egalitarianism are not compatible.  All sparked by the discussion on libertarian Democrats from Markos.  Got all that?  Good.  Moving first to his main point:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Libertarian Egalitarianism: Myth or Reality?</strong></p>
<p>Bruce McQuain responds to my post that questioned his earlier statement that libertarianism and egalitarianism are not compatible.  All sparked by the discussion on libertarian Democrats from Markos.  Got all that?  Good.  Moving first to his main point:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Voting As A Commodity</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/10/13/markos-moulitsas/a-new-breed-of-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Voting As A Commodity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-unbound.org/?p=308#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>[...] There is much exortation from Democrats and the Left to join them this November in vanquishing the Republican majority, and from Republicians and the Right for their supporters not to stay home when said vanquishing begins. It occurs to me that what the severely political set is missing about the average voter is that, to these voters, the franchise has a value. If you contemplate a person&#8217;s vote as a sort of commodity one that can only be sold in the political market,* you may recognize that in order for someone to part with that vote, their minimum price must be met. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is much exortation from Democrats and the Left to join them this November in vanquishing the Republican majority, and from Republicians and the Right for their supporters not to stay home when said vanquishing begins. It occurs to me that what the severely political set is missing about the average voter is that, to these voters, the franchise has a value. If you contemplate a person&#8217;s vote as a sort of commodity one that can only be sold in the political market,* you may recognize that in order for someone to part with that vote, their minimum price must be met. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
