<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voluntary and Coercive Action: A Key Distinction in the Overall System of Liberty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/05/14/richard-a-epstein/voluntary-and-coercive-action-a-key-distinction-in-the-overall-system-of-liberty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/05/14/richard-a-epstein/voluntary-and-coercive-action-a-key-distinction-in-the-overall-system-of-liberty/</link>
	<description>Big Ideas for a Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 00:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taxation is Not Coercive? But Property Is. Or Isn&#8217;t. Is it?</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/05/14/richard-a-epstein/voluntary-and-coercive-action-a-key-distinction-in-the-overall-system-of-liberty/#comment-64257</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8230;no third solution &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taxation is Not Coercive? But Property Is. Or Isn&#8217;t. Is it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 03:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-unbound.org/?p=480#comment-64257</guid>
		<description>[...] None of it is my doing, but the Cato piece I referenced earlier in the week has stirred up quite the discussion. The vanguards of liberty seem to be in very short supply these days, and this is terribly unfortunate for a number of reasons - not the least of which is the fact that most of the writers are distinguished scholars in one field or another. Consider Richard Epstein&#8217;s response, where, towards the end, he addresses the libertarian idea that taxation is akin to theft:  But [Libertarians] typically overstate their categorical case against taxation, because they refuse to look at the benefit side of the equation&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] None of it is my doing, but the Cato piece I referenced earlier in the week has stirred up quite the discussion. The vanguards of liberty seem to be in very short supply these days, and this is terribly unfortunate for a number of reasons - not the least of which is the fact that most of the writers are distinguished scholars in one field or another. Consider Richard Epstein&#8217;s response, where, towards the end, he addresses the libertarian idea that taxation is akin to theft:  But [Libertarians] typically overstate their categorical case against taxation, because they refuse to look at the benefit side of the equation&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
