<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Limits of Self-Enforcing Agreements</title>
	<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/</link>
	<description>Big Ideas for a Better World</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  5 Jul 2008 19:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-97017</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-97017</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Debating the Case for Anarchy:&lt;/strong&gt;

At Cato Unbound, economist Peter Leeson has summarized some of his innovative research showin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Debating the Case for Anarchy:</strong></p>
<p>At Cato Unbound, economist Peter Leeson has summarized some of his innovative research showin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Diversion</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-96728</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Diversion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-96728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Self-enforcing agreements&lt;/strong&gt;

Dani Rodrik, surrounded by anarcho-sympathizing libertarians at Cato Unbound, thoughtfully discusses the limits of self-enforcing agreements. In response to Peter Leeson's claim that we don't see "shriveling international commerce in the absence of ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Self-enforcing agreements</strong></p>
<p>Dani Rodrik, surrounded by anarcho-sympathizing libertarians at Cato Unbound, thoughtfully discusses the limits of self-enforcing agreements. In response to Peter Leeson&#8217;s claim that we don&#8217;t see &#8220;shriveling international commerce in the absence of &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who needs government anyway? &#171; The visible hand in economics</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95627</link>
		<dc:creator>Who needs government anyway? &#171; The visible hand in economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95627</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be that many everyday transactions, such as those cited by Leeson, would exist without government involvement. However, as Rodrik points out, these sort of things don&#8217;t scale well. They tend to rely on repeated transactions to maintain co-operation. Once people have to interact on a one-shot basis, as in most large economies, this co-operation breaks down without enforcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It may be that many everyday transactions, such as those cited by Leeson, would exist without government involvement. However, as Rodrik points out, these sort of things don&#8217;t scale well. They tend to rely on repeated transactions to maintain co-operation. Once people have to interact on a one-shot basis, as in most large economies, this co-operation breaks down without enforcement. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheophileEscargot from Hulver's site</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95608</link>
		<dc:creator>TheophileEscargot from Hulver's site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 09:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I've never believed in suicide, but...&lt;/strong&gt;

Reading; "Fool's Fate", "Great Ideas of Psychology". Watching. MLP. 
What I'm Reading Finished Fool's Fate, third book in the trilogy. Pretty good, keeps the attention, easy to read in a couple of sessions.
 Little bit disappointed though: the t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I&#8217;ve never believed in suicide, but&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Reading; &#8220;Fool&#8217;s Fate&#8221;, &#8220;Great Ideas of Psychology&#8221;. Watching. MLP.<br />
What I&#8217;m Reading Finished Fool&#8217;s Fate, third book in the trilogy. Pretty good, keeps the attention, easy to read in a couple of sessions.<br />
 Little bit disappointed though: the t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95104</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95104</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The invisible hook 2&lt;/strong&gt;

Dani Rodrik replies: "The problem with self-enforcing agreements is that they do not scale up. One of the findings from Elinor Ostrom’s extensive case studies is that self-enforcing arrangements to manage the “commons” work well only when the ge...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The invisible hook 2</strong></p>
<p>Dani Rodrik replies: &#8220;The problem with self-enforcing agreements is that they do not scale up. One of the findings from Elinor Ostrom’s extensive case studies is that self-enforcing arrangements to manage the “commons” work well only when the ge&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian Living: Angolan trade in the 19th century &#171; Lila Rajiva: The Mind-Body Politic</title>
		<link>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95023</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian Living: Angolan trade in the 19th century &#171; Lila Rajiva: The Mind-Body Politic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/09/dani-rodrik/the-limits-of-self-enforcing-agreements/#comment-95023</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: I found an interesting response from Dani Rodrik, &#8220;The Limits of Self-Enforcing Agreeements,&#8221;akso at Cato Unbound,which I am linking here. I actually reference Rodrik&#8217;s work in my new book with Bill Bonner, in chapter 3,  in a rather lighthearted way in wondering how much democracy is really correlated with economic success. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Update: I found an interesting response from Dani Rodrik, &#8220;The Limits of Self-Enforcing Agreeements,&#8221;akso at Cato Unbound,which I am linking here. I actually reference Rodrik&#8217;s work in my new book with Bill Bonner, in chapter 3,  in a rather lighthearted way in wondering how much democracy is really correlated with economic success. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
