by Randy E. Barnett
The Conversation
February 20th, 2008
Julian Sanchez thinks that Nozick did make a descriptive argument for why a “monopolistic” dominant protection agency would develop. He may be right and I thank him for his response. But Nozick’s claim in the passages highlighted by Julian is far from transparent. In the first passage he references, for example, Nozick describes the natural [...]
by Randy E. Barnett
The Conversation
February 20th, 2008
In his reply to my post, Tony repeats a common mischaracterization of Nozick’s argument. In Anarchy, State and Utopia, Nozick made no prediction about the emergence of a dominant protection agency. Nor did he describe a mechanism for that emergence. Rather, his argument was that a dominant protection agency could emerge morally without violating anyone’s [...]
Learn more about the Cato Institute:
Stay up-to-date daily on issues at the Cato Institute:
Editor: Jason Kuznicki
Senior Editor: Gene Healy
Cato Unbound is powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).