by Bryan Caplan
The Conversation
October 22nd, 2008
Before this conversation ends, I’d like to press Charles Murray and Pedro Carneiro on signaling:
For Charles: In your view, why precisely does the market financially reward students for taking lots of classes that at best seem distantly related to job performance? You don’t seem ready to sign on to my signaling story. Do you have [...]
by Charles Murray
The Conversation
October 22nd, 2008
Give me changes in the direction that Kevin Carey and Pedro Carneiro suggest in their most recent posts, and I’ll retire to the sidelines a happy man.
by Pedro Carneiro
The Conversation
October 21st, 2008
I agree that IQ, or at least some good measure of cognitive achievement, largely determines whether you succeed or not in college, although other factors can also play a role. And some people have more of it than others, so college is not for everyone. But for a large set of individuals, getting a BA [...]
by Kevin Carey
The Conversation
October 20th, 2008
Let me suggest something that perhaps we can all agree on, convictions about IQ aside. We need a higher education system that produces much more accurate information about the students it enrolls and educates.
The standard degree consists of only two useful pieces of information printed on a single sheet of paper: the type of degree [...]
by Bryan Caplan
The Conversation
October 20th, 2008
I’m slightly puzzled by Murray’s analogy that “IQ is to success in life (or in college) as weight is to an offensive tackle in the NFL.” If Murray’s only point is that there is some IQ threshold below which it is nearly impossible to complete college, I agree. But the college threshold is vastly below [...]
by Charles Murray
The Conversation
October 20th, 2008
It should go without saying that the IQ equivalent of 300 pounds for theoretical physicists is different than for, say, public policy analysts. But there is an equivalent for success in every job—and for success in every college major. And, yes, it does of course have fuzzy borders. There are still a few 288-pound offensive [...]
by Charles Murray
The Conversation
October 20th, 2008
Regarding Bryan’s point that there are many reasons people don’t complete college, it remains true that IQ plays a fundamental role. It was expressed perfectly by NYU sociologist Steve Goldberg: IQ is to success in life (or in college) as weight is to offensive tackles in the NFL. The correlation between weight and performance among [...]
by Bryan Caplan
The Conversation
October 18th, 2008
Another intriguing Kevin Carey question:
The United States has historically been a leader among most nations in adopting policies designed to induce large numbers of people to pursue college degrees and to reduce the price of doing so. And the United States has the most productive, well-educated workforce in the world. In recent decades, many of [...]
by Bryan Caplan
The Conversation
October 18th, 2008
Kevin Carey raises an interesting point:
Bryan is correct that the job market doesn’t provide a lot of partial credit for higher education. But in saying so, he seems to accept Murray’s blanket contention that people don’t graduate from college because they’re not smart enough to handle college-level work. This just isn’t true.
If this really is [...]
by Charles Murray
The Conversation
October 18th, 2008
I did not invent the definition of college readiness that the College Board used. I am not “alleging” that only 10 percent of youths have an SAT score that meets that definition, based on the students at 41 major state and private universities. That’s an empirical finding. I am not saying that an SAT score [...]
Read: Clarifying What I Thought Was Already A Clear Position
by Kevin Carey
The Conversation
October 17th, 2008
Charles, in your book you identify 1180 as the combined SAT score cutoff for college readiness, based on the study you cite. U.S. News & World Report reports the 25th and 75th percentile combined SAT scores for colleges and universities in its annual rankings. Here’s a list of colleges and universities ranked as “Tier One” [...]
Read: Why Are So Many “College-Unready” Students Doing So Well in College?
by Charles Murray
The Conversation
October 17th, 2008
Quick identity switch from man of the people to arrogant elitest snob. Let me go back to the statistic I introduced in my original article. The College Board defined “college readiness” as a 65 percent probability of getting a 2.7 freshman grade-point average or better, and then used freshman records from 41 major universities to [...]
by Kevin Carey
The Conversation
October 16th, 2008
Bryan is correct that the job market doesn’t provide a lot of partial credit for higher education. But in saying so, he seems to accept Murray’s blanket contention that people don’t graduate from college because they’re not smart enough to handle college-level work. This just isn’t true. Researchers have been [...]
Read: If Higher Ed Subsidies Are Wasteful, Why Don’t We See Competitive Countries Cutting Them?
Learn more about the Cato Institute:
Stay up-to-date daily on issues at the Cato Institute:
Editor: Will Wilkinson
Managing Editor: Jason Kuznicki
Senior Editor: Brink Lindsey
Cato Unbound is powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).