by Clay Shirky
The Conversation
July 24th, 2009
I want to react to Paul Starr’s observations about subsidy, which I largely agree with.
To put his observations in economic terms, we have been in the unusual and happy situation, in the 20th century, of having an essential positive externality — an informed public, supported by an aggressive and talented press corps — subsidized both [...]
by Steve Yelvington
The Conversation
July 24th, 2009
Philip Meyer writes, “The second trend is moving journalism from a hunter-gatherer activity to one more focused on processing.”
In the debate over news on the Internet, what professor Meyer calls “processing” is a point of bitter division.
A traditionalist view says there’s no news without a professional reporter to dig it up. This view often regards [...]
by Clay Shirky
The Conversation
July 24th, 2009
While I agree with almost everything Steve Yelvington has written about the news business, I do want to take issue with one thing: I think assuming long-term profitability of smaller papers is whistling past a pretty big graveyard, for several reasons.
First, the internet businesses that provide better service at less cost for markets like classifieds, [...]
by Clay Shirky
The Conversation
July 23rd, 2009
When you get four old white guys talking about journalism (45 may make me the baby of this quartet), you usually get re-runs of The Front Page and reminiscing about what a great paper the St. Louis Post-Dispatch used to be. What strikes me about the four posts here is the shared assumption that the [...]
Learn more about the Cato Institute:
Stay up-to-date daily on issues at the Cato Institute:
Editor: Will Wilkinson
Managing Editor: Jason Kuznicki
Senior Editor: Brink Lindsey
Cato Unbound is powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).