July, 2010

The History of Government in Darwinian Liberalism

by Larry Arnhart
The Conversation
July 26th, 2010

In my lead essay, I argue that “evolutionary psychology has confirmed and deepened the Darwinian understanding of moral order that arises in civil society through the spontaneous order of human action rather than the coercive order of governmental design.” Herbert Gintis claims that there is no evidence for this conclusion. He writes, Every known society [...]

Read: The History of Government in Darwinian Liberalism

Defending Darwinian Liberalism: A Response to Gintis, Myers, and Tiger

by Larry Arnhart
The Conversation
July 21st, 2010

In my lead essay, I have argued that Darwinian science supports classical liberalism. The responses to my essay from P. Z. Myers, Herbert Gintis, and Lionel Tiger show a wide range of reactions — the general disagreement of Myers, the partial agreement of Gintis, and the general agreement of Tiger. Myers declares that “evolution does [...]

Read: Defending Darwinian Liberalism: A Response to Gintis, Myers, and Tiger

Reflections on Arnhart’s Darwinian Liberalism

by Herbert Gintis
Reaction Essay
July 19th, 2010

Herbert Gintis agrees that evolutionary biology is an important influence that shapes human societies, but he rejects the idea that it leads to classical liberalism. At best, the evidence for the claim has not been adequately presented. And further, substantial evidence exists supporting the opposite – far from implying a classical liberal civil society, human biology has been shaped, and has arguably conformed on a genetic level, to communal governance. Gintis argues that we should take cognizance of our evolutionary history, then, and perhaps enact more rather than less communal regulation of moral norms.

Read: Reflections on Arnhart’s Darwinian Liberalism

Much Work Left to Be Done in Connecting Politics and Evolution

by Lionel Tiger
Reaction Essay
July 16th, 2010

Lionel Tiger criticizes Arnhart’s account of evolutionary politics for its incompleteness on several fronts. First, if we are really going to describe politics in terms of evolutionary psychology, we need to engage with a long conversation already underway, on just this subject, going back to the early twentieth century and even before. Second, what about the gap between the rational economic actors of classical theory — and the distinctly irrational results of the business cycle? Third, what can the move from evolutionary psychology to politics learn from the parallel developments in our understanding of religion? And fourth, what about gender, which is a constant source of research material for biologists, but a relatively rare topic in libertarian thought?

Read: Much Work Left to Be Done in Connecting Politics and Evolution

Evolution is Far Freer than Classical Liberalism

by PZ Myers
Reaction Essay
July 14th, 2010

PZ Myers agrees that Charles Darwin’s political views were liberal, but he argues that these views have nothing to do with science. Nor should they, he continues. We are rightly suspicious of Marxist science, because injecting politics into scientific inquiry entails biased conclusions. Everyone, of every ideology, needs science, because science grounds us in reality. Evolutionary biology appears to be true by every measure we have designed, and its overall structure has been overwhelmingly confirmed, but this still doesn’t, and shouldn’t, make it political.

Read: Evolution is Far Freer than Classical Liberalism

Darwinian Liberalism

by Larry Arnhart
Lead Essay
July 12th, 2010

In this month’s lead essay, political scientist Larry Arnhart observes that there are indeed some universal values shared among all human societies, and that these appear to spring from a common evolutionary heritage. Such values, he argues, are the basis of a classical liberal politics that, while recognizing and even affirming individual differences, still offers us a common set of especially human values. Today’s evolutionary psychology, he argues, points the way to a new take on classical liberalism.

Read: Darwinian Liberalism

Final Response

by David E. Bernstein
Reaction Essay
July 2nd, 2010

Sheldon writes, “David Bernstein remains unconvinced that a massive nonviolent direct-action movement could have broken the Southern white-supremacist business cartel without Title II. We’ll never know, of course. But we do know that incredible progress was being made.” Richman is surely right that some progress was being made, especially outside the Deep South and in [...]

Read: Final Response